Over the past few weeks, both the NAACP and Black Lives Matter have publicly supported a moratorium on charter schools.
Hilary, of course, has separated herself from Obama’s education reform agenda.
So where are the politics of charter schools heading?
First, it’s worth remembering, that charter schools had left-ish origins, though the break with labor happened quite quickly after the first charter law was passed.
Since then, charters have mostly maintained bi-partisan federal support (Clinton -> Bush -> Obama) and generally bi-partisan state support, save for rural red states (Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, etc.) and very left leaning states (Washington, Massachusetts, etc).
This has led to charters achieving national ~10% year over year growth for much of their existence.
Present Day Populist Politics
We are clearly in a populist moment. Bernie, Hilary, and Trump all have veered toward more populist agendas, and for good reason: widening income inequality, pressure from globalization, stagnating wages, and other difficulties have increased the popularity of populist policies.
Present Day Identity Politics
Additionally, on the left, we’ve seen an increase in explicit identify based politics, with Hilary (smartly) courting minorities who feel (rightly) excluded from the Republican agenda.
The Values of Charter Schools, Populism, and Identity
Historically, charters have not benefited from either populist or identity politics.
Populist politics is born out of protecting what we have – or returning to a past golden age – while charter schools are about creating new options that can displace existing institutions and staff.
Identity politics is born out of affiliation – not efficiency – and charters schools have historically been advocated for on the basis of efficiency, merit, and innovation.
In short, charter schools are not well situated for either populist or identity politics.
The values associated with charters schools – choice, freedom, efficiency, innovation, etc. – are simply not the values of populism and identity.
This is not to say that the values of populism and identity are wrong (some of the values, such as community and dignity for all appeal deeply to me). But they are undoubtedly different than the values often associated with charter schools.
Charter School Enrollment Only Moves in One Direction
In the long-run, charters will continue to grow. As I’ve written before, charter market share only goes in one direction: up.
Charter schools, unlike many reform efforts, have both a teacher and a family constituency, which means that their political power grows with every additional school that is opened.
Of course, the pace of growth will be affected by political conditions, but I’m highly skeptical that the sky is falling.
Growth will continue.
And, if recent trends, continue, overall quality will continue to improve and charters will continue to deliver academic gains for low-income children.
Is There Anything To Do?
Perhaps. Both populist and identity politics present openings for charter advocates to broaden their coalition.
On the populist side, there is room to build bridges with those who distrust elitist authority. The idea of a group of citizens working together to form a school for their children harkens back to periods of American history that are viewed favorably by many populist.
On the identity side, African-American and Latino families continue to choose charter schools in large numbers, and the charter community could do more to build bridges with race based organizations that consist of, or serve, these families (which are generally poorer than the constituencies of more middle class identity based organizations).
I’m less optimistic that there are bridges to be built with teacher unions. Their support of the charter cap in Massachusetts, which is home to the highest-performing charter sector in the nation, seems to clearly signal that teacher unions are fighting a zero-sum market share game. If this is the case, no bridges will be built.
Keep Your Eye on Growth, Not Press Releases
While reading the headlines of Hillary’s latest press conference, or the NAACP’s latest press release, can provide a temperature check on the national mood – ultimately, the day-to-day actions of dozens of states, hundreds of charter authorizers, thousands of cities, and hundreds of thousands of educators will determine whether or not charter schools continue to grow.
Headlines will always be more fog than flashlight.
Lastly, don’t be surprised if Hilary shifts to the center as she has to govern.