The Big Short, David Kirp, Newark, Union City, New Orleans

 

I saw The Big Short last night. It is an excellent movie and I agreed with much of its implicit and explicit critique of banks, government, and consumers.

___

David Kirp has a piece on Newark in the New York Time today. He argues that Union City (district reform) is a better path than Newark reforms (including expanding Newark’s charter schools).

He did not mention New Orleans in his piece.

___

I’ve written a lot on Newark.

You can read the shortest and most direct version here.

___

As with most great movies, in The Big Short the audience feels connected to the protagonists.

In The Big Short, the protagonists are those betting against the big banks by shorting the housing market.

Here is how I personally related to the protagonists: I feel like I hold an opinion that most people view as wrong (that charter districts will outperform traditional districts); that I have data to support this case (New Orleans + CREDO analysis of urban charter markets); and that many people are either ignoring or misinterpreting this data.

Of course, this is a fairly self-serving way of looking at the world (and watching a movie). And the world is surely more complicated than this. As such, I try to check myself as often as I can.

But most of us who takes sides on an issue, except in moments of deeply honest reflection, are the heroes of our own story – and I’m no different, especially when caught up in watching a great movie.

I’m sure that David Kirp views his tribe as the protagonists who are fighting against the corporate reformers who have all the power and money.

There is some truth in this.

___

Another way to say all this: strong opinions are inherently egoistic, as such, it is often best that they are weakly held.

I sometimes worry that my strong opinions are no longer weakly held.

___

What I loved about The Big Short – and financial markets as a whole – is that there is a way to call bullshit.

You can short the people who are wrong.

I wish there was an accepted way to do this in public policy that actually worked.

First, I want there to be a way to more quickly correct policy beliefs that I believe are harming children.

Second, I want to hold people (including myself) accountable for our beliefs.

Third, as with most competitive people, I want to win.

I try to keep the first reason, rather than third reason, at the forefront.

___

 

Last year, when Doug Harris’ study came out and demonstrated that New Orleans had achieved greater academic gains than any other urban school district that the researchers knew of, I thought this would change people’s opinions on whether the reforms worked.

I’m not sure that it did.

Instead, the argument shifted to the gains coming at too high of a cost. And to the gains not being replicable in other cities.

In short, the goal posts were moved.

If you have not made a bet, you can move the goal posts all day long.

___

Of course, I might be wrong about my beliefs.

If I end up being wrong, I hope that I am honest enough to close down this blog with a post that says: I was wrong.

Most of all, I’ll be saddened that I devoted a good bit of my working years to something that did not help anyone.

2 thoughts on “The Big Short, David Kirp, Newark, Union City, New Orleans

  1. Puget Sound Parent

    Oh come on, Mr. Kingsland. Stop trying to sound like MLK when you hold public policy perspectives that are virtually identical to Chris Christie, Jeb Bush and John Kasich.

    It’s bad enough to witness your sad and vain attempt to steer people away from the obvious conclusion, but to hear such tortured “logic” makes most normal people cringe.

    I’d actually have more grudging respect for you, despite your awful views and actions, if you just admitted, straight out, ala John Stossel and Michelle Rhee that you detest anything with the words “public”, “union” or “majority female” and just continue your obsequious behavior towards your billionaire backers.

    Hey, I get it; like you, I have to eat too—and sometimes that means “eating” shit from those who control your income. But do you have to be SO shamefully compliant and so intellectually dishonest about all of it?

    Like

    Reply
  2. Puget Sound Parent

    Oh, one more thing, Mr. Kingsland—incidentally your surname DOES sound like a Ruling Elite Functionary trying desperately to become a “member”…good luck with that. ;-)—if you liked “The Big Short” so much, how can you sleep at night, knowing that the people funding you are essentially the same folks OR share the same exact mentality as the sociopaths who crashed the economy due to their insatiable greed in 2008?

    Like

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s